One Law

Re-thinking governance. We only need one law - the Non-Aggression Principle - the foundation of libertarianism - to maximize justice, peace, and prosperity.

  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
  • Pages & Categories
  • Contact

December 7, 2017 by SC Striebeck

Chris Christie’s Situational Federalism

Chris Christie’s Situational Federalism

New Jersey’s governor says states have a right to legalize sports betting but not marijuana.

Source: Chris Christie’s Situational Federalism

Situational federalism? I like it! But “arbitrary federalism” may be more accurate.

Because at the end of the day, it’s still a small group of people living off the theft of taxation arbitrarily using force to impose their moral agenda upon others.

Another great reason more folks would appreciate the Non-Aggression Principle; then live it as the rule of law.

Note:  The views expressed are solely the opinion of the author.
Conceptual and title source: reason.com
Media source: reason.com
Image source: reason.com; Jacob Sullum

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Accountability, Action, Anarcho-capitalism, Choice, Decentralization, Despotism, Federalism, Force, Freedom, Justice, Non-Aggression Principle, Power, Regulation, United States Constitution

July 3, 2016 by SC Striebeck

No, Gun Culture Was Not Manufactured by the Gun Industry | Foundation for Economic Education

No, Gun Culture Was Not Manufactured by the Gun Industry | Foundation for Economic Education

“Debunking a recent book claiming that the gun industry created American gun culture solely with clever marketing.”

Source: No, Gun Culture Was Not Manufactured by the Gun Industry | Foundation for Economic Education

Whatever the history, and if you truly own your own body, doesn’t it make sense that you should be able to assume responsibility for your own protection?

And if so, then in the interest of justice, shouldn’t you have access to the same weapons i.e. technology or advantage as the criminals …and government for that matter?

Let’s face it, the know-how to manufacture arms won’t disappear soon, if ever. Greater regulation will expand black-market transactions for arms and associated criminal activity – the mechanics are identical to those which totally derailed Prohibition and War on Drugs.

Nonetheless, the efforts to skew history beyond common sense would be humorous, if it wasn’t for the often undue validity and importance bestowed upon academic “scholarship”, especially when it is frequently funded with taxpayer dollars channeled by special interests – no conflict of interest there:)

Note:  The views expressed are solely the opinion of the author.
Conceptual and title source:  Clayton E. Cramer who teaches history at College of Western Idaho via fee.org.
Media source:  www.fee.org

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Gun rights, Justice, Peace, Self-Ownership

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3

Recent Posts

  • The Internet, AI, You and a Lot More Lawyers
  • Entrepreneurs Can Break The Vicious Cycle in Healthcare
  • Is More Regulation Over Employee Salaries Good for Employees?
  • The Truth About Society & Fueling the Polarization of Culture?
  • So What if TikTok is a National Security Risk
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
  • Pages & Categories
  • Contact

Copyright © 2025 · Generate Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

%d