One Law

Re-thinking governance. We only need one law - the Non-Aggression Principle - the foundation of libertarianism - to maximize justice, peace, and prosperity.

  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
  • Pages & Categories
  • Contact

December 18, 2017 by SC Striebeck

Why We Should Worry About China …and Every Government

Why We Should Worry About China …and Every Government

Many of our readers might remember the late 80s. There were hundreds of movies, songs and books about the inevitable Japanese economic invasion. The ones of you that did not live that period can see that it did not happen.

Source: Why We Should Worry About China

More accurately, why we should worry about any government.

Not only are growth targets inevitably subject to gross political misrepresentation and are inherently unreliable, they misconstrue true economic value  …which is purchasing power. When everyone’s purchasing power is increasing, then so is our collective wealth. This is the only standard any one needs to know. People will always need stuff, so jobs will ebb and flow with demand.

Then think about why the purchasing power of the USD is worth ~5% of what it was a little over 100 years ago – just prior to the dawn of the Federal Reserve Bank and its never-ending tendency to dilute the value of your earnings.

Its actions result in counterfeiting and all counterfeiting is theft. You may believe that since it is committed by government it is ok; that it is for the greater good; that the majority rules, etc.

But if you recognize that government is nearly always wrong, wasteful and corrupt; that people, even in government are naturally self-interested first relative to the good of society; and, that majoritarian rule is equivalent to sanctioned mob rule, then you can see that a more just society cannot exist until we relieve ourselves of these fictions and commit to the deconstruction of government and the inequitable class structure it creates.

Market-based governance founded on a single rule of law, equally applicable to all, is the most just and sustainable solution to better solving virtually every problem that affects society.

So, if you want a better economy, government will never be the answer. They are mutually exclusive.

Note:  The views expressed are solely the opinion of the author.
Conceptual and title source: Mises Wire Why We Should Worry About China by Daniel Lacalle
Media source: Mises Wire

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Accountability, Anarcho-capitalism, Anarcho-libertarianism, Democracy, Entrepreneurialism, Federal Reserve Bank, Federalism, Free market anarchism, Non-Aggression Principle, Sustainability

December 7, 2017 by SC Striebeck

Chris Christie’s Situational Federalism

Chris Christie’s Situational Federalism

New Jersey’s governor says states have a right to legalize sports betting but not marijuana.

Source: Chris Christie’s Situational Federalism

Situational federalism? I like it! But “arbitrary federalism” may be more accurate.

Because at the end of the day, it’s still a small group of people living off the theft of taxation arbitrarily using force to impose their moral agenda upon others.

Another great reason more folks would appreciate the Non-Aggression Principle; then live it as the rule of law.

Note:  The views expressed are solely the opinion of the author.
Conceptual and title source: reason.com
Media source: reason.com
Image source: reason.com; Jacob Sullum

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Accountability, Action, Anarcho-capitalism, Choice, Decentralization, Despotism, Federalism, Force, Freedom, Justice, Non-Aggression Principle, Power, Regulation, United States Constitution

December 5, 2017 by SC Striebeck

Can States Compel You to Bake a Cake Against Your Will? The Supreme Court Will Decide.

Can States Compel You to Bake a Cake Against Your Will? The Supreme Court Will Decide.

Masterpiece is the first such case to make it to the justices.

Source: Can States Compel You to Bake a Cake Against Your Will? The Supreme Court Will Decide.  By Stephanie Slade at reason.com

Masterpiece exposes another gross example of democracy/federalism gone bad …which always occurs… given sufficient time.

But more specifically, such cases show the limitation of nearly all laws, but especially those which create arbitrary classes and bright-line definitions that eventually reveal substantial uncertainty, create confusion, and then worse, become the basis for legal conclusions that are beyond absurd …like forcing a baker to bake a cake for someone …for whatever reason. And, not to mention, that such laws are not practically enforceable; thus, a waste of resources.

But perhaps most importantly, affirmation of such laws fuels the expansion of the veiled slavery under which virtually all of us live. I can only pray that SCOTUS doesn’t it take itself too seriously, and relieves us of another pseudo-intellectual juggernaut against those who earn their livelihood through mutual consent versus those that feel compelled to enforce this tripe, and can afford to do so only through the force government because there is no economic check on the theft of taxation.

Note:  The views expressed are solely the opinion of the author.
Conceptual and title source: reason.com
Media source: reason.com
Image source: reason.com; Katherine Mangu-Ward

Share this:

  • Click to share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window) Reddit
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • More
  • Click to print (Opens in new window) Print

Like this:

Like Loading...

Filed Under: Anarcho-capitalism, Anti-American, Anti-Slavery, Central Planning, Checks and Balances, Choice, Decentralization, Democracy, Despotism, Federalism, Force, Free market, Free market anarchism, Freedom, Government, Non-Aggression, Politics, SCOTUS, Self-Ownership, Taxation, Tyranny, United States Constitution

  • « Previous Page
  • 1
  • …
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • …
  • 9
  • Next Page »

Recent Posts

  • The Internet, AI, You and a Lot More Lawyers
  • Entrepreneurs Can Break The Vicious Cycle in Healthcare
  • Is More Regulation Over Employee Salaries Good for Employees?
  • The Truth About Society & Fueling the Polarization of Culture?
  • So What if TikTok is a National Security Risk
  • Home
  • About
  • Resources
  • Pages & Categories
  • Contact

Copyright © 2025 · Generate Pro Theme on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in

%d